Author Topic: UPDATED: 4 Actions For 'Readers' Who Are Committed (Reply #5)  (Read 2151 times)

GenericUser

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 157
  • Karma: +8/-0
1- Join with lifetime subscription - current offer, ASA01S, includes 'Alien Security'
    https://yowinc.co/product_info.php?cPath=27&products_id=95https://yowinc.co/product_info.php?cPath=27&products_id=95

2- Get THIS booklet - Survival Wellness Advocacy, SWA1,
    https://yowinc.co/product_info.php?products_id=174

3- Sign up for limited enrollment (VERY limited) webinars, if space remains
    https://yowinc.co/index.php?cPath=71&osCsid=1c25e3d74341bb09b4afe5feb3b8bfdf

4- Remember the paradox (apparent contradiction) of this life:
    a) Less is more
    b) Smaller is stronger
    c) Last is first
    d) To give is to receive

While time remains. Why? JUST DO IT and the discussion will follow.
« Last Edit: August 11, 2015, 09:00:16 AM by GenericUser »

GenericUser

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 157
  • Karma: +8/-0
4 Actions For 'Readers' Who Are Committed --- Addenda
« Reply #1 on: April 20, 2015, 01:24:47 PM »
1- Join with lifetime subscription - current offer, ASA01S, includes 'Alien Security'
    https://yowinc.co/product_info.php?cPath=27&products_id=95https://yowinc.co/product_info.php?cPath=27&products_id=95

2- Get THIS booklet - Survival Wellness Advocacy, SWA1,
    https://yowinc.co/product_info.php?products_id=174

3- Sign up for limited enrollment (VERY limited) webinars, if space remains
    https://yowinc.co/index.php?cPath=71&osCsid=1c25e3d74341bb09b4afe5feb3b8bfdf

4- Remember the paradox (apparent contradiction) of this life:
    a) Less is more
    b) Smaller is stronger
    c) Last is first
    d) To give is to receive

While time remains. Why? JUST DO IT and the discussion will follow.

To help illustrate the prior, opening post....

Implications of Supernatural Intelligence in the Fine-tuning of Universal Constants

There are several conditions of our universe necessary for the emergence of any complex life form. Many of these conditions are so exceedingly improbable that it is not reasonable to expect that they could have occurred by pure chance For this reason many physicists attribute their occurrence to supernatural design. Some other physicists prefer to believe instead in trillions upon trillions of “other universes” (which are unobserved and likely unobservable). Before discussing which explanation is more probative, we need to explore some specific instances of this highly improbable fine-tuning. We may break the discussion into two parts:

1. The exceedingly high improbability of our low entropy universe, and

2. The exceedingly high improbability of the anthropic values of our universe’s constants.

We will discuss each in turn.

The high improbability of a pure chance occurrence of our low-entropy universe

A low-entropy universe is necessary for the emergence, development, and complexification of life forms (because a high entropy universe would be too run down to allow for such development). Roger Penrose has calculated the exceedingly small probability of a pure chance occurrence of our low–entropy universe as 10^10^123 to one. How can we understand this number? It is like a ten raised to an exponent of:

100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000.

This number is so large, that if every zero were 10 point type, our solar system would not be able to hold it! Currently, there is no natural explanation for the occurrence of this number, and if none is found, then we are left with the words of Roger Penrose himself:

    “In order to produce a universe resembling the one in which we live, the Creator would have to aim for an absurdly tiny volume of the phase space of possible universes—about 1/10^10^123 of the entire volume, for the situation under consideration.”

What Penrose is saying here is that this occurrence cannot be explained by a random (pure chance) occurrence. Therefore, one will have to make recourse either to a multiverse (composed of bubble universes, each having different values of constants) or as Penrose implies, a Creator (with a super-intellect).
The high improbability of five other anthropic conditions (based on cosmological constants)

A cosmological constant is a number which controls the equations of physics, and the equations of physics, in turn, describe the laws of nature. Therefore, these numbers control the laws of nature (and whether these laws of nature will be hospitable or hostile to any life form). Some examples of constants are: the speed of light constant (c= 300,000 km per second), Planck’s constant (ℏ = 6.6 x 10-34 joule seconds), the gravitational attraction constant (G = 6.67 x 10-11 ), the strong nuclear force constant (gs = 15), the weak force constant (gw = 1.43 x 10-62), the mass of the proton (mp = 1.67 x 10-27 kg), rest mass of an electron (me = 9.11 x 10-31 kg), and charge of an electron proton (e = 1.6 x 10-19 coulombs). There are several other constants, but these pertain to the following anthropic coincidences (highly improbable conditions required for life).

(i) If the gravitational constant (G) or weak force constant (gw) varied from their values by an exceedingly small fraction (higher or lower) -- one part in 10^50 (.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001) then either the universe would have suffered a catastrophic collapse or would have exploded throughout its expansion, both of which options would have prevented the emergence and development of any life form. This cannot be reasonably explained by pure chance.

(ii) If the strong nuclear force constant were higher than its value (15) by only 2%, there would be no hydrogen in the universe (and therefore no nuclear fuel or water -- this would have prohibited life). If, on the other hand, the strong nuclear force constant had been 2% lower than its value then no element heavier than hydrogen could have emerged in the universe (helium, carbon, etc). This would have been equally detrimental to the development of life. This “anthropic coincidence” also seems to lie beyond the boundaries of pure chance.

(iii) If the gravitational constant, electromagnetism, or the “proton mass relative to the electron mass” varied from their values by only a tiny fraction (higher or lower), then all stars would be either blue giants or red dwarfs. These kinds of stars would not emit the proper kind of heat and light for a long enough period to allow for the emergence, development, and complexification of life forms. Again, these “anthropic coincidences” are beyond pure chance occurrence.

(iv) If the weak force constant had been slightly smaller or larger than its value, then supernovae explosions would never have occurred. If these explosions had not occurred, there would be no carbon, iron, or earth-like planets.

(v) Fred Hoyle and William Fowler discovered the exceedingly high improbability of oxygen, carbon, helium and beryllium having the precise values to allow for both carbon abundance and carbon bonding (necessary for life). This “anthropic coincidence” was so striking that it caused Hoyle to abandon his previous atheism and declare:

    “A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question.”

(For all five “anthropic coincidences,” refer to NPEG Chapter One, Sect. II and Lectures #5 and 6 of PID.)

The odds against all five of the anthropic coincidences happening randomly is so exceedingly improbable that it is like telling a monkey to type out the corpus of Shakespeare perfectly by random tapping of the keys. After returning two weeks later the entire corpus of Shakespeare, Hamlet, Macbeth, Richard III, are all perfectly recounted. Most reasonable and responsible individuals would not attribute this to random occurrence (because the odds are so overwhelmingly against it), and so, they look for another explanation which is more reasonable and responsible.

For this reason, no respectable physicist (including Stephen Hawking), believes that these anthropic coincidences can be explained by pure chance. In view of the fact that no natural explanation has been found for them, most physicists have made recourse to two trans-universal explanations:

1. A multiverse (a naturalistic explanation) and

2. A super intellectual Creator (a supernatural explanation).

Is the naturalistic explanation more reasonable and responsible? Not necessarily because the other universes (and the multiverse itself) are in principle unobservable. Furthermore, it violates the principle of parsimony (Ockham’s Razor) – the explanation with the least number of assumptions, conditions, and requirements is to be preferred. As Paul Davies notes:

 Another weakness of the anthropic argument is that it seems the very antithesis of Ockham’s razor, according to which the most plausible of a possible set of explanations is that which contains the simplest ideas and least number of assumptions. To invoke an infinity of other universes just to explain one is surely carrying excess baggage to cosmic extremes … It is hard to see how such a purely theoretical construct can ever be used as an explanation, in the scientific sense, of a feature of nature. Of course, one might find it easier to believe in an infinite array of universes than in an infinite Deity, but such a belief must rest on faith rather than observation.[8]

3. All known multiverse theories have significant fine-tuning requirements. Linde’s chaotic inflationary multiverse cannot randomly cough out bubble universes because they would collide and make both universes inhospitable to life; the bubble universes must be spaced out in a slow roll which requires considerable fine-tuning in the multiverses initial parameters.[9] Similarly, Susskind’s String Theory landscape requires considerable meta-level fine-tuning to explain its “anthropic" tendencies.[10]

Conclusions

Given these problems, is the multiverse a more reasonable and responsible explanation of our universe’s anthropic coincidences? Many physicists believe that it is not, not only because of the above three problems, but also because of the likelihood of a Creator (not presented here).

When the evidence for a beginning (a Creator) is combined with the exceedingly high improbability of the above anthropic coincidences, a super intellect may be the most reasonable and responsible explanation because it avoids all the problems of a hypothetical multiverse.

Thus, it is both reasonable and responsible to believe on the basis of physics, that there is a very powerful and intelligent being that caused our universe to exist as a whole.
  ;)


http://magisgodwiki.org/index.php?title=Cosmology#The_2003_Borde-Vilenkin-Guth_Theorem_.28the_BVG_Theorem.29



1st serve your neighbor
2rd serve your'self'
In the fulfillment of the paradox created by the Creator, the 2nd becomes 1st (as discussed earlier).

GenericUser

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 157
  • Karma: +8/-0
Re: 4 Actions For 'Readers' Who Are Committed --- Addenda
« Reply #2 on: April 22, 2015, 07:19:36 PM »
1- Join with lifetime subscription - current offer, ASA01S, includes 'Alien Security'
    https://yowinc.co/product_info.php?cPath=27&products_id=95https://yowinc.co/product_info.php?cPath=27&products_id=95

2- Get THIS booklet - Survival Wellness Advocacy, SWA1,
    https://yowinc.co/product_info.php?products_id=174

3- Sign up for limited enrollment (VERY limited) webinars, if space remains
    https://yowinc.co/index.php?cPath=71&osCsid=1c25e3d74341bb09b4afe5feb3b8bfdf

4- Remember the paradox (apparent contradiction) of this life:
    a) Less is more
    b) Smaller is stronger
    c) Last is first
    d) To give is to receive

While time remains. Why? JUST DO IT and the discussion will follow.

To help illustrate the prior, opening post....

Implications of Supernatural Intelligence in the Fine-tuning of Universal Constants

There are several conditions of our universe necessary for the emergence of any complex life form. Many of these conditions are so exceedingly improbable that it is not reasonable to expect that they could have occurred by pure chance For this reason many physicists attribute their occurrence to supernatural design. Some other physicists prefer to believe instead in trillions upon trillions of “other universes” (which are unobserved and likely unobservable). Before discussing which explanation is more probative, we need to explore some specific instances of this highly improbable fine-tuning. We may break the discussion into two parts:

1. The exceedingly high improbability of our low entropy universe, and

2. The exceedingly high improbability of the anthropic values of our universe’s constants.

We will discuss each in turn.

The high improbability of a pure chance occurrence of our low-entropy universe

A low-entropy universe is necessary for the emergence, development, and complexification of life forms (because a high entropy universe would be too run down to allow for such development). Roger Penrose has calculated the exceedingly small probability of a pure chance occurrence of our low–entropy universe as 10^10^123 to one. How can we understand this number? It is like a ten raised to an exponent of:

100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000.

This number is so large, that if every zero were 10 point type, our solar system would not be able to hold it! Currently, there is no natural explanation for the occurrence of this number, and if none is found, then we are left with the words of Roger Penrose himself:

    “In order to produce a universe resembling the one in which we live, the Creator would have to aim for an absurdly tiny volume of the phase space of possible universes—about 1/10^10^123 of the entire volume, for the situation under consideration.”

What Penrose is saying here is that this occurrence cannot be explained by a random (pure chance) occurrence. Therefore, one will have to make recourse either to a multiverse (composed of bubble universes, each having different values of constants) or as Penrose implies, a Creator (with a super-intellect).
The high improbability of five other anthropic conditions (based on cosmological constants)

A cosmological constant is a number which controls the equations of physics, and the equations of physics, in turn, describe the laws of nature. Therefore, these numbers control the laws of nature (and whether these laws of nature will be hospitable or hostile to any life form). Some examples of constants are: the speed of light constant (c= 300,000 km per second), Planck’s constant (ℏ = 6.6 x 10-34 joule seconds), the gravitational attraction constant (G = 6.67 x 10-11 ), the strong nuclear force constant (gs = 15), the weak force constant (gw = 1.43 x 10-62), the mass of the proton (mp = 1.67 x 10-27 kg), rest mass of an electron (me = 9.11 x 10-31 kg), and charge of an electron proton (e = 1.6 x 10-19 coulombs). There are several other constants, but these pertain to the following anthropic coincidences (highly improbable conditions required for life).

(i) If the gravitational constant (G) or weak force constant (gw) varied from their values by an exceedingly small fraction (higher or lower) -- one part in 10^50 (.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001) then either the universe would have suffered a catastrophic collapse or would have exploded throughout its expansion, both of which options would have prevented the emergence and development of any life form. This cannot be reasonably explained by pure chance.

(ii) If the strong nuclear force constant were higher than its value (15) by only 2%, there would be no hydrogen in the universe (and therefore no nuclear fuel or water -- this would have prohibited life). If, on the other hand, the strong nuclear force constant had been 2% lower than its value then no element heavier than hydrogen could have emerged in the universe (helium, carbon, etc). This would have been equally detrimental to the development of life. This “anthropic coincidence” also seems to lie beyond the boundaries of pure chance.

(iii) If the gravitational constant, electromagnetism, or the “proton mass relative to the electron mass” varied from their values by only a tiny fraction (higher or lower), then all stars would be either blue giants or red dwarfs. These kinds of stars would not emit the proper kind of heat and light for a long enough period to allow for the emergence, development, and complexification of life forms. Again, these “anthropic coincidences” are beyond pure chance occurrence.

(iv) If the weak force constant had been slightly smaller or larger than its value, then supernovae explosions would never have occurred. If these explosions had not occurred, there would be no carbon, iron, or earth-like planets.

(v) Fred Hoyle and William Fowler discovered the exceedingly high improbability of oxygen, carbon, helium and beryllium having the precise values to allow for both carbon abundance and carbon bonding (necessary for life). This “anthropic coincidence” was so striking that it caused Hoyle to abandon his previous atheism and declare:

    “A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question.”

(For all five “anthropic coincidences,” refer to NPEG Chapter One, Sect. II and Lectures #5 and 6 of PID.)

The odds against all five of the anthropic coincidences happening randomly is so exceedingly improbable that it is like telling a monkey to type out the corpus of Shakespeare perfectly by random tapping of the keys. After returning two weeks later the entire corpus of Shakespeare, Hamlet, Macbeth, Richard III, are all perfectly recounted. Most reasonable and responsible individuals would not attribute this to random occurrence (because the odds are so overwhelmingly against it), and so, they look for another explanation which is more reasonable and responsible.

For this reason, no respectable physicist (including Stephen Hawking), believes that these anthropic coincidences can be explained by pure chance. In view of the fact that no natural explanation has been found for them, most physicists have made recourse to two trans-universal explanations:

1. A multiverse (a naturalistic explanation) and

2. A super intellectual Creator (a supernatural explanation).

Is the naturalistic explanation more reasonable and responsible? Not necessarily because the other universes (and the multiverse itself) are in principle unobservable. Furthermore, it violates the principle of parsimony (Ockham’s Razor) – the explanation with the least number of assumptions, conditions, and requirements is to be preferred. As Paul Davies notes:

 Another weakness of the anthropic argument is that it seems the very antithesis of Ockham’s razor, according to which the most plausible of a possible set of explanations is that which contains the simplest ideas and least number of assumptions. To invoke an infinity of other universes just to explain one is surely carrying excess baggage to cosmic extremes … It is hard to see how such a purely theoretical construct can ever be used as an explanation, in the scientific sense, of a feature of nature. Of course, one might find it easier to believe in an infinite array of universes than in an infinite Deity, but such a belief must rest on faith rather than observation.[8]

3. All known multiverse theories have significant fine-tuning requirements. Linde’s chaotic inflationary multiverse cannot randomly cough out bubble universes because they would collide and make both universes inhospitable to life; the bubble universes must be spaced out in a slow roll which requires considerable fine-tuning in the multiverses initial parameters.[9] Similarly, Susskind’s String Theory landscape requires considerable meta-level fine-tuning to explain its “anthropic" tendencies.[10]

Conclusions

Given these problems, is the multiverse a more reasonable and responsible explanation of our universe’s anthropic coincidences? Many physicists believe that it is not, not only because of the above three problems, but also because of the likelihood of a Creator (not presented here).

When the evidence for a beginning (a Creator) is combined with the exceedingly high improbability of the above anthropic coincidences, a super intellect may be the most reasonable and responsible explanation because it avoids all the problems of a hypothetical multiverse.

Thus, it is both reasonable and responsible to believe on the basis of physics, that there is a very powerful and intelligent being that caused our universe to exist as a whole.
  ;)


http://magisgodwiki.org/index.php?title=Cosmology#The_2003_Borde-Vilenkin-Guth_Theorem_.28the_BVG_Theorem.29



1st serve your neighbor
2rd serve your'self'
In the fulfillment of the paradox created by the Creator, the 2nd becomes 1st (as discussed earlier).

When the evidence for a beginning (a Creator)....

Watch this 20 minute video:


https://vimeo.com/119727492

MEEK <> doormat. Given Marshall Master's astute observation, often repeated these days, that one can find roadsigns on the highway to a destination of Truth simply by following what is ignored and/or bashed with 'skillfully placed disinformation.' (http://yowusa.com/2015/02/). That 20 minute video skillfully reduces the B-V-G Theorem into food that can be digested by everyone ... other than the proud or those with an agenda.

The fact is that the theorem was finalized circa 2001. It was somehow 'forgotten' by Dr. Stephen Hawkins in his latest book as he never mentioned it. Further, how many of you have heard about it or read about it? It's been 15 years! NO ONE has been able to contradict it or disprove it but the 10 year effort was valiant indeed. But science these days is no longer science and enough said on that score.

Meek and humble of heart, as a child. To serve, and 'to inform' is one way of serving. We know that is what these threads are all about and I'll be excerpting part of a piece Marshall wrote which underscores the point elegantly.

Remember, webinars:

http://yowusa.com/survival-wellness-advocacy/swa-relocation-webinars/

The cost is $10.00 per person and each paid attendee will receive a personalized survival relocation assessment during the webinar.

After the initial Survival Wellness Advocacy presentation and survival relocation assessments, there will be an open mic, question and answer period for all attendees.

    Each attendee will receive a personalized survival relocation assessment based on their current address relative to potential relocation areas of interest to them.

    The number of attendees is limited to ten paid attendees to ensure personalized attention. If you happen to be the only paid attendee in attendance, the webinar is conducted as scheduled.

    Attendees will be able to dialogue with each other in the chat room, while the mics are off during the initial presentation and survival relocation assessments.

During the initial presentation, Marshall will tell you about....

GenericUser

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 157
  • Karma: +8/-0
Part #4: 2 Meditations For 'Readers' Who Are Committed
« Reply #3 on: May 05, 2015, 08:08:18 PM »
As a preface, you know this applies equally to both men and women; all of these threads do....

You already have all you need to bring home the trophy but for those looking to kick the extra point after scoring as an exultation of the win, the following two meditations are suggested (from the 2nd Testament, sometimes called the New Testament):

1) The wedding at Cana. You are there sitting at the table. Mary, speaking to her Son, notes that the wedding reception has run out of wine to which He replies along the lines of why are you telling me this because my time has not yet come. She doesn't respond but instead calls the waiter and tells him to do whatever He says. Her Son proceeds to turn water into wine. After a while they get up and leave, He beginning His ministry (His time had now come!).

Meditate first on the mother's relationship with her Son, like she 'knows' that He will answer/respond to her implied request and He in turn does not refuse his mother. To meditate, find a quiet, private place without chance of interruption or disturbance. Get relaxed and comfortable. Say a spontaneous prayer for assistance. Read the passage. Dwell mentally on that relationship for 10-20 minutes. If your mind wanders, bring it back. If related thoughts arise, follow them. Say a spontaneous prayer of thanksgiving.

The next time for meditation do it again...and again...until you 'feel' there is nothing left. Then see if anything else appeals to you in this passage, and if so, go with it. For example, "do whatever He tells you" just might be also speaking to us ... for example.

2) The Prodigal Son. Do as above only the focus here is on the father. Realize that the son, given the time and audience when told, greatly-hugely insulted his father, his family, his friends, relatives, town and indeed the entire Jewish people in leaving them, rejecting everything about them, living without morals, ethics, even with pigs which represented the dirtiest of all animals. Ponder the father, how he waited, hoped, patiently looked each day and finally how he reacted to this son when seeing him approaching from afar in complete and utter filth.
Ponder the ring which was in those days the sign of family, heredity, etc. That wayward son who had repented had reacquired INHERITance of the family name while the son who remained received 'all' the father had to give. FOCUS ON THE FATHER.
When you feel there is nothing left you can do as above and follow other things like the attitude of the father toward the other son, ie. prostrating himself on the ground and begging him to not feel hurt, or anything else. KNOW THAT THE FATHER REPRESENTS OUR ALL POWERFUL CREATOR! Can you handle that? Our God the definition of Meekness and Humility? The Eternal One who created space and time and us, un-imaginably so full of LOVE for us that he pleads to us to TRUST Him? Meditate and meditate.

Somewhere amongst these two, sometime, somehow, you will likely receive a gift of Contemplation. When it occurs, don't question it, don't think about it, don't try and make it last, don't anything other than just let go of everything and give yourself to it, in totem, COMPLETELY, just looking, feeling, enjoying the gift and when it's over, then give a deep THANK YOU!

OK, it's all yours, guys and gals, to not only inherit the earth but to fly like an eagle, no, to soar like you just can't imagine. Once done, you've acquired the promised protection alluded to in one line of Part B in an earlier thread. There''s a word for it that doesn't come to mind but it's a misinterpretation of this, the real meaning.

GenericUser

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 157
  • Karma: +8/-0
Re: 4 Actions For 'Readers' Who Are Committed
« Reply #4 on: May 31, 2015, 03:47:42 PM »
1- Join with lifetime subscription - current offer, ASA01S, includes 'Alien Security'
    https://yowinc.co/product_info.php?cPath=27&products_id=95https://yowinc.co/product_info.php?cPath=27&products_id=95

2- Get THIS booklet - Survival Wellness Advocacy, SWA1,
    https://yowinc.co/product_info.php?products_id=174

3- Sign up for limited enrollment (VERY limited) webinars, if space remains
    https://yowinc.co/index.php?cPath=71&osCsid=1c25e3d74341bb09b4afe5feb3b8bfdf

4- Remember the paradox (apparent contradiction) of this life:
    a) Less is more
    b) Smaller is stronger
    c) Last is first
    d) To give is to receive

While time remains. Why? JUST DO IT and the discussion will follow.

A link to Marshall Masters' latest wisdom. For all of us, what we have in common is so much more important than the details of where we differ. This particular topic went on a path of it's own, first into Cosmology and second into Meditation. This link will return us to where we thought we were going. Thank you Marshall!

http://yowusa.com/2015/05/gods-mission-and-planet-x/

GenericUser

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 157
  • Karma: +8/-0
UPDATED: 4 Actions For 'Readers' Who Are Committed
« Reply #5 on: August 11, 2015, 08:56:44 AM »
1- Join with lifetime subscription - current offer, ASA01S, includes 'Alien Security'
    https://yowinc.co/product_info.php?cPath=27&products_id=95https://yowinc.co/product_info.php?cPath=27&products_id=95

2- Get THIS booklet - Survival Wellness Advocacy, SWA1,
    https://yowinc.co/product_info.php?products_id=174

3- Sign up for limited enrollment (VERY limited) webinars, if space remains
    https://yowinc.co/index.php?cPath=71&osCsid=1c25e3d74341bb09b4afe5feb3b8bfdf

4- Remember the paradox (apparent contradiction) of this life:
    a) Less is more
    b) Smaller is stronger
    c) Last is first
    d) To give is to receive

While time remains. Why? JUST DO IT and the discussion will follow.

One Yardstick of Progress (Internal/spiritual)

The Giver

Sometimes one picture is worth a thousand words. This is such a picture ... a movie in fact. Do not 'pre-screen' it, only figure out a way to watch it without knowing anything about it. Then you will have one yardstick of your progress. How? By evaluating your responses, such as thoughts and emotions, to each event. Spiritual? Only you can decide. This is it's web site for after viewing:

http://thegiverfilm.com/

It has begun being carried by cable/satellite TV channels too.
Also --
Update on the webinars: Now modified to cover the enabling of communities