Planet X Town Hall

Socrates & R.R. Book - PERMACULTURE, and methods for gathering food and water => PERMACULTURE => Topic started by: SocratesR on July 02, 2014, 06:01:47 PM

Title: post-cataclysmic soil
Post by: SocratesR on July 02, 2014, 06:01:47 PM
This is an extension of an old topic The soil in the Aftertime (https://planetxtownhall.com/index.php?topic=1073.0) which mainly mentions seaweed as a source of iodine to neutralize toxins, and to keep worms in storage.

Geoff Lawton is the 'prince of permaculture', the successor to the permaculture throne worn by Bill Mollison. On YouTube one can see his Greening the Desert project where he creates a self-sustaining fruit-bearing forest in the harshest place on Earth.
I made a 5 min. compilation. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZfRbVylblA)
In a place with minimal annual rainfall and terrible heat, he has created an oasis. It did not take long and it did not take loads of water.

Most impressive of all, perhaps, is how his efforts there produced fruit in soils that had been deemed too saline to work with. It turns out that if you give plants half a chance, they will deal with soil problems themselves.
I suggest you take the 5 minutes to watch this famous initiative. It proves once again that it is knowledge and not effort that brings success.


I personally plan to bring some good soil into storage. If one is to sprout seeds successfully, one will be needing good soil.
However, if the Earth is physically rocked, the atmosphere that's always turning around with the planet at 1000kph will quickly turn into winds twice the speed of those found in the worst tornadoes. Not only will that mean that every single tree on the planet will be swept away, but so will a lot of topsoil. (It is Paul LaViolette's opinion that it is such forces that create coal reserves, for organic matter will wind up in great piles and end up as coal after millennia.)

Title: Re: post-cataclysmic soil
Post by: Socrates on July 19, 2016, 12:44:56 PM
So i greatly elaborated on the topic of soil in my post Proper Soil Management (https://planetxtownhall.com/index.php?topic=6315.msg90134#msg90134) but the fact remains that after a global cataclysm (still) having soil could mean the difference between life and death (including the difference between survival and cannibalism...).

One might consider burying a stash of soil and covering it with a layer of concrete, or stashing some in a cave, etc. etc.
You saved seeds... Turns out dried and pulverized cow dung makes a perfect medium in which to sprout your dear seeds. So you might at least have some of that kept in a safe place.
As i mentioned in Proper Soil Management, woodchips make a fine medium in which to grow crops. Thankfully, some companies and city services will bring you their mountain of woodchips, to your home, for free; otherwise THEY have to deal with it. So let this pile of potential soil mature somewhere safe and Bob's your uncle. You can go dig it out and bring it to where it's most needed after TSHTF.
Title: Re: post-cataclysmic soil
Post by: redhairedgirl on July 19, 2016, 04:53:55 PM
Socrates:
Again, thanks for this post. I will follow the link and your advice.

I think you're a brain trust......
Will look at your other tidbits at the site you indicate... As always, if I can ever help you, please don't hesitate.
Thank you!
Patty
Title: Securing soil
Post by: Socrates on December 12, 2016, 08:32:50 AM
Talking about soil a thought did strike me about how to go about securing it.

Not all trees root deep [like Sequoia and many fruit trees that are more shallow and wide rooting] but trees that do root deep do great work in anchoring the soil. Having said that, tall trees would be the first to blow away in a megagale and would the tree break off or would it carry away tons of soil with it when it goes...?

Here are 2 ideas to go about securing soil:
- plant vetiver in a grid pattern; it roots deeply but the wind has no hold on the grassy top
- plant deep-rooting trees but be ready to cut them down to stumps should you see Nibiru in the sky; that way the roots will stay to anchor the soil since the wind will have no great hold on stumps. Not only that, but after TSHTF these stumps might sprout forth new shoots that grow into trees that you'll be very grateful to have.
Title: Growing soil 1.01
Post by: Socrates on April 17, 2017, 07:23:27 AM
First, understand: what is soil?

Conventional sources will tell you soil is a mystery and that it's a 'limited resource'. That's because conventional sources tow the party line of megacorps out to sell you pesticides, herbicides, pharmaceuticals, hybrid seeds, fertilizer etc. and it is this very party line that has already desertified 30% of the world's arable lands. These megacorps basically run the world because their influence of government is so great. So when their model of business destroys [!] soil, it's sold to the general public that the destruction of soil is inevitable and not the fault of megacorps making trillions...
If you're looking for the truth about soil, therefore, government and business are the exact wrong place to go looking.

Soil is neither a limited resource nor as mystical as TPTB would have us all believe. Actually, in the end soil is basically carbon + nitrogen. And a child can understand as much if we take compost heaps as an example:
A compost heap is built up of nearly equal parts of carbon-rich ingredients called browns and nitrogen-rich ingredients called greens. Layer them, keep the heap moist, and your browns and greens will soon turn into soil.
Yeah, there are bacteria and other lifeforms involved and, yeah, you can speed things up by inocculating your pile with fresh soil, but in the end such lifeforms are not your worry; they will come, sooner or later.

Mineral content is an issue, for the trees and plants you grow in soil require them. Trees will dig down and actually get minerals from rock underground. Plants are generally more about 'recycling' minerals, getting them from the soil or from decomposing twigs and leaves and such. You can add minerals, like adding diluted seawater, but this, too, is generally not your worry.


Now, imagine a world void of soil. Actually, 500,000,000 years ago there was no soil; that's about when such things started to develop. Anyway, you create soil by leaving browns and greens together in a moist environment. It's not rocket science. But there are a few basic ways in which one goes about setting up a soil-producing environment.
- @ Fordhall (https://www.fordhallfarm.com/) they teach that one can keep ruminants on grasslands that are composed of many varieties of grass and other herbs. These lawns actually thrive when grazed regularly; understand that flora and fauna evolved in unison and ruminants are not some kind of 'parasites' on flora. They need each other.
The important thing is to let the flora be grazed but then allow it to recuperate for a few months before putting ruminants on it again. The soil underneath will grow and grow and after a few years, one might till it and use it for planting a garden or something.
- the second most natural way to create soil is to plant trees. Permaculture teaches to plant a so-called food forest by putting down many more trees than will ultimately end up at that location. As the trees root down and grow higher, more and more of them are sacrificed to serve the forest as a whole. The forest will soon grow to be self-sustainable, needing neither irrigation nor protection from winds.

There are things one can do to support the production of good soil.
- Terra preta (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terra_preta) is about soil with inocculated charcoal, pieces of pottery and bones; the charcoal supplies carbon that allows for great fungal life, while the pottery shards slowly give off water during dry periods. So one might create biochar, leave it in a ditch with manure/urine/etc. for a few weeks, then bury it with bone and pottery. Terra preta served Amazonian cultures for a thousand years since jungle soil tends to be shallow.
- Just adding biochar/charcoal to the soil can do wonders. Your soil can be up to 50% charcoal.
- Black sands are largely magnetite; up to 10% of the soil can be made up of it and it will greatly increase your yield and size of fruits.
- wood chips are the ultimate ground coverage; however, other ground cover can be very supportive as well, like hay, grass or straw. Whatever you do, you have to keep the ground covered. Adding a few inches to start with and perhaps an inch every year after that is a great idea. When you wish to plant a seed or seedling, move some covering aside and use the soil underneath. But understand a few things:
- you can't plant in wood chips themselves
- you can't mix the wood chips with soil; it has to decompose on top of the soil
- things like manure and wood chips take time to decompose before they're useful to flora

You may at some point find yourself in immediate need of soil. You can scavenge for it, digging it up from around trees, shrubs or plants. If you've a little more time but no great flora to harvest, get what organic material you find and collect it in heaps that can turn into soil. Know that a compost pile needs to be a certain minimal size or it will not turn into soil properly, quickly or at all.
You can enrich a compost pile with fish leftovers or seaweed; just cover the fish with enough (greens and) browns so you don't create terrible smells.
Obviously manure from either domesticated or wild animals can also be harvested/scavenged/collected and added to a compost pile; it's similar to harvesting fruit, it's just 'food' that you're collecting for your plants...


When collecting humanure, there's a reason people cover excrement with sawdust and the like: the sawdust are browns, the rest are greens, i.e. nitrogen-rich. Together they work to create soil (in time). So just make sure you at least have some leaves or twigs to add to human waste. This also stops the smells (and you won't have to keep the 'outhouse' far from your home).

Similarly, excrement from animals can be dealt with so you neither have to deal with odours or flies. As long as you combine greens and browns, things will decompose nicely. And if you have chickens and the like going over dung heaps, your fly problems should stay away.


I've seen so many poor folk 'sitting on their butts', killing time, when they might be making themselves useful by making soil in which they could grow things. They're surrounded by all kinds of plant life, but because those plants can't be harvested or don't produce fruit, they reckon they'll just ignore them... This is ignorance in action!
Even if YOU don't have anything to eat, the least you can do is collect greens to feed to goats or rabbits or something; then you can eat THESE in time.
Ignorance of what soil is and how it is created has untold millions sitting around on their hands while they could be creating soil, planting food forests and keeping animals. And Geoff Lawton proved to the world (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZfRbVylblA&app=desktop) that there are just about no places in the entire world that are too hot or too dry to grow food; it's almost always all about ignorance, not opportunity.
Title: Growing soil 1.02
Post by: Socrates on April 18, 2017, 09:34:57 AM
I've linked to this farmer before who has amazing numbers in his soil, and he talks about neighbors who have only 1, 5 or 10% the results he does.
This 'permaculture farmer' does 3 things:
- polyculture [i.e. no monocrops]
- no-till farming [no ploughing and no emptying a field of unused organic matter]
- no fertilizers, chemicals, pesticides, etc.

He talks about his neighbors, one of which also applies polyculture, the other does no-till farming and the other doesn't use any chemicals or anything; yet they all fall way short of his own results. And it's easy to understand why...

Just don't get in Mother Nature's way! You should be working with nature, not fighting her at every turn. Emulate nature:
- does one see monocrops in nature?
- is there ploughing going on in nature?
- is anyone spraying chemicals in nature?
You can pat yourself on the back because you stopped spraying chemicals, but if you're still tilling the soil and laying waste to underground environments, why do you really even bother? It may help a little bit but in the end you're still not respecting what naturally needs to take place for soil to do well.

So let's say, for instance, you're using wood chips; in nature twigs and other organic matter fall on top of the ground and start decomposing there. But then there are people who hear about wood chips and think: "Hey! I'm gonna 'help nature along' and mix the wood chips with the soil!" Does that happen in nature? No. So why bother? Why do all that extra effort? Fact is, it doesn't help; it hurts [something about the wood chips sucking nitrogen out of the soil, i'm not sure].

Emulate forests; emulate great herds of animals. Let's take another for instance:
you've heard herbivores eat grass and that this stimulates the growth of grass. So now perhaps you're thinking: "Hey! If i just cut the grass, then the animals won't be trampling the grass and that'll be even better!" Except you'd be wrong.
When a herd of animals comes by, they defecate and pee and walk it all into the soil, massaging it, then birds come by and scatter it all some more; predators kill some of the herbivores and remains of the kill work themselves into the soil, etc. etc. etc.
So how could you coming by to cut the grass ever emulate all of that?
The best you can do is take over the role of the predator and keep your animals on the move so they don't overgraze or overmanure or overtrample a spot.

Just always keep nature in mind. (Just like Masanobu Fukuoka (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masanobu_Fukuoka) taught, as well.)
Title: Re: post-cataclysmic soil
Post by: Yowbarb on November 19, 2017, 03:04:48 PM
Socrates, great posts...
Title: Re: post-cataclysmic soil
Post by: Yowbarb on November 19, 2017, 03:05:08 PM
The Earth Around Us: Maintaining A Livable Planet

screen shot of excerpt, when searching for chicken poop as decontaminant
Title: Re: post-cataclysmic soil will take time
Post by: Socrates on March 26, 2019, 11:49:40 AM
"What did i wish i'd known when i started farming?" (https://youtu.be/vHTslTP8nvE?t=78), this farmer asks. Answer: Stuff takes time.

Planting a food forest and growing soil all take time. I know many folk think composting is the way to go, but that is based on the assumption that there's something to compost...
Well, if Doug Vogt's ideas about entire oceans running off (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhENb-Su9WE) is anywhere near correct, i predict that the only thing left in nature will be seeds. There won't be forests to forage or hunt, there won't be trees to burn, animals to catch; nothing. Nothing but what you manage to save.
But even then, it's going to take time to get things going.

I predict that the greatest challenge will be to keep your animals, containing genetic information, alive long enough to reestablish a viable homestead. If there are other survivors, they will try to eat your creatures [and you, most likely] and if you haven't put away enough food, or enough variety of foods, you may be tempted to harvest them (prematurely) yourself.
However, for your own long term sake, the sake of your children and the sake of mankind, the information that makes it through TEOTWAWKI must be protected and kept alive. This will take time. Dedication. Vision.
Forewarned is forearmed. Disappointment is the result of unrealistic expectations so better not to entertain overly optimistic hopes and dreams. Save those for later...
Title: post-cataclysmic soil
Post by: Socrates on December 23, 2019, 09:42:37 AM
Firstly, i'd like to point out that the planetXtownhall forum lacks what i've collected under Fertilizing Soil (https://b2012overleven.runboard.com/f29) on my online database. Furthermore,
this post is based on a few assumptions:
1: the post-cataclysmic world may have neither forests [trees] nor soil
2: Maslow in mind, any other (ignorant) survivors are enemies, not allies
3: there's a reason the oldest hominids stem from equatorial regions

Plant a fish head under a tomato plant (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ae4MfwcsX4E) shows what 'American pilgrims' said saved their lives: plant fish under maize (or it will diminish the soil).
In the above link, this Australian gardener shows his experiment of growing tomatoes [a known superfood if grown in good soil, with 56 minerals as opposed to 12 minerals of tomatoes grown in conventional dirt].

Now, why is this interesting?
Because the oceans are the oceans and nothing about seawater is going to change.
Also, humans have survived in Indonesia for 100,000 years; why? Hmmm, maybe because of their thousands of miles of coastline near the equator. I.E. because they had access to marine riches no matter nuclear winter or terrestial devastation.


Ultimately, the truth is that the minerals of the sea are an ultimate source of life and opportunity.
What if you planted grass in minerally-dense ground?
What if you planted all kinds of seeds in properly mineralized soil?
We all count on soils that have developed over the centuries, but what if those soils disappear? What then?

So that's what i'm talking about.
The closer to the equator you are after TSHT, the better.
The closer to an ocean you are after TSHT, the better.
The better you understand the importance of minerals to life, the better.
And seawater is a source of minerals and life we ignore at our peril.
Title: Re: post-cataclysmic soil
Post by: Jimfarmer on December 23, 2019, 01:13:53 PM
Quote
The closer to the equator you are after TSHT, the better.
The closer to an ocean you are after TSHT, the better.

After, yes;  During, no.

So, let the equator and the ocean come to you during the pole crust shift and the following sea-level rise.

(I'll try to post some relevant maps later, time permitting)
Title: Re: location
Post by: Socrates on December 23, 2019, 07:40:35 PM
After, yes;  During, no.
I am assuming common sense and other considerations like altitude of course.
But i'd like to hear your take on being 'close' to the equator and why that'd be bad.
Title: Re: post-cataclysmic soil
Post by: Yowbarb on December 23, 2019, 09:20:35 PM
Firstly, i'd like to point out that the planetXtownhall forum lacks what i've collected under Fertilizing Soil (https://b2012overleven.runboard.com/f29) on my online database. Furthermore,
this post is based on a few assumptions:
1: the post-cataclysmic world may have neither forests [trees] nor soil
2: Maslow in mind, any other (ignorant) survivors are enemies, not allies
3: there's a reason the oldest hominids stem from equatorial regions

Hi Socrates, I started a soil topic years ago but it was in the Surviving in Place Board, just moved it this Permaculture Board.
The soil in the Aftertime   by Yowbarb on September 27, 2010, https://planetxtownhall.com/index.php/topic,1073.msg11426.html#msg11426

My earlier Topic on soil was before I had started the first Permaculture Topics (and before I had set up the Permaculture Board)  so this topic you have started here is fine. Please continue to share all you want to from your own forums.
My older topic is for reference, read only, locked it.
Thanks!
Barb T.
Title: Elaine Ingham; one the world's leading soil scientists
Post by: Socrates on April 24, 2020, 02:27:36 AM
I studied the work of Joel Salatin for a month, listening to podcasts and youtube vids every day. Great stuff. I'm going to try to make a compilation of what can be found online, though i would just recommend to everyone in the world to listen to at least 10 hours of Joel Salatin... Then i went on to Elaine Ingham.

Like Joel Salatin, i've been hearing about the work of Elaine Ingham for years. For the longest time it seemed too complicated and detailed to bother getting into. However, with Joel Salatin having paved a way to get a grip on most practical aspects of soil and farming, i became interested in learning more about the nitty gritty of it all. So then one graduates to Elaine Ingham. I've now been listening to podcasts and youtube vids on her work for a few weeks. It's a little less accessible than that of Joel Salatin because many online posts and sources with her talking actually last many hours. However, if you put in the time, you start to get just how important and foundational her work is and how it can benefit anyone, as well as how it can benefit mankind. Since there are so many talks to choose from, i offer you here one that i feel gives a great all-round feel and content, this one on Spotify with host Probiotic Life (https://open.spotify.com/episode/4j1jUwEotMCOggKFZSALa9). A great primer.


Dr. Ingham's message is important for a number of reasons. She makes clear:
- what the priorities are in relation to soil
- what is not important that even permaculturalists mistakenly believe to be so
- what is essential that even permaculturalists commonly ignore
- she is a hard-core scientist, respected for her scientific methods and an "authority" in every sense of the word
- high-placed governmental and other policy makers take what she says seriously [even if they then choose to ignore it]
- her results speak for themselves, with fields producing 300 to 900% more crops, often after just a single season

IMPORTANT:
- aeration; anaerobic conditions create pathogens and poisons that are detrimental to plants and beneficial soil life
- compacted earth/dirt must be dealt with [(one time) tilling, broad forks, keyline plowing, measuring/researching the ground, etc.]
- LIFE: it's all about a healthy balance of bacteria and fungi
- (obviously:) moisture

NOT IMPORTANT:
- minerals, including chemical fertilisers [NPK]
- composition of the ground
- frequent/reliable precipitation


It sounds too good to be true but if you listen to her for a few hours, i think you'll get where she's coming from.
The main thing is that her research transcends the idea that people are needed to add minerals to the ground in order for plants to use. In her 45 years of research she has proven that there is a subterranean cycle in which plants photosynthesize sugars that they use themselves but also offer bacteria and fungi in trade for what minerals they need; nematodes eat these and defecate them where they fed: next to the plant roots that exuded the sugars.

Dr. Ingham relates experiments in what was basically sand to which they added the necessary bacteria and fungi; just one season later that 'sand' acts like soil, in that it is full of bacterial and fungal lifeforms with others feeding off of them, the whole subterranean cycle, acting to supply the plant with whatever it needs.
One of the most interesting things she explains is that most ground holds just about every mineral a plant could want for and that if the necessary bacteria and fungi are present, they will draw those minerals from the local rocks and such.


This is all very good news for a potential situation in which we have little, no or poor soil to work with. Dr. Ingham is very big on proper composting, i.e. making sure your compost pile:
- gets hot enough
- contains the proper ratio of nitrogen to carbon, i.e. feeds both bacteria and fungi
- remains aerobic
The way she explains it, people who use either no or poor quality compost [or what's called "compost"] think they have to be supplying minerals to their plants when their mistake was in allowing the microbiome to die off [compaction, anaerobic conditions, poisonous (levels of) additives, tilling, etc.]. She says that if you add minerals to vibrant soil, it won't make a difference at all, i.e. because the bacteria and fungi are already supplying the plants with whatever they need.

Dr. Ingham's research alone could heal the world. But for us as preppers, it's lessons are also paramount.
It is now scientifically clear: if you're to grow food, you need to know how to properly make compost piles and how to heal dirt [that should be "soil"].
Her research is so fundamental that she explains that even monocropping won't destroy the soil as long as you have added good compost [i.e. the necessary bacteria and fungi] and thereafter refrain from destroying the microbiome (you created). You won't even need to keep throwing on new compost every year.
Title: Re: post-cataclysmic soil
Post by: R.R. Book on April 24, 2020, 05:35:05 AM
This makes very good sense to  me, except that when animals are permitted into a compost system to help work it, there is less need in my experience for the piles to build heat - the animals sort of accelerate the process.

Soc, I've learned so much about soil stewardship from you, that I wish you and GF could see the beautiful deep "soil" that is building up here - mostly from the "big three": peat, rotted leaves and shredded or rotted wood.  Very little dirt involved, except when heeling in orchard trees (then it's Big Three plus a little native soil for stability).  And all sourced on-site except for the peat.

Then one can add icing on the cake with peelings, worm castings, soured milk, coffee grounds, etc., but as you've explained, nature takes care of the minerals if we take care of the basic structure.  :)
Title: Re: post-cataclysmic soil
Post by: ilinda on April 24, 2020, 07:13:20 PM
It's embarrassing to admit, but in spite of growing food for decades, I am quite uneducated to the intricate details of soils, compost, and things related.  Yes, I read the articles and watch the videos, but for some strange reason, that area is always "on the back burner" for now, as there are so many other topics vying for attention.

So, I do appreciate your posts, Soc, along with RR.  A little side note:  I saw Dr. Elaine Ingham give a presentation at a conference on genetic engineering back in the late 1990's and she is just as you said--quite knowledgeable on soil, soil microorganisms, etc.  She also told the audience about her invovlement with a genetically engineered bacterium, called at that time Klebsiella planticola, and how it had been mutated so that it could break down spent crop residue at end of season.  Problem is the genetic changes made this common soil bacterium a sort of plant killer.  It produced ethanol, or possibly some other alcohol, and in the process was really good at killing plants, any and all plants.  When they discovered this, they retrieved all of the cultures and burned them to make certain it never "got out", where it would have literally had a "field day" eating its way across the planet.

She said, "we think we got it all.
Title: Re: post-cataclysmic soil
Post by: R.R. Book on April 25, 2020, 03:10:21 PM
It's embarrassing to admit, but in spite of growing food for decades, I am quite uneducated to the intricate details of soils, compost, and things related.  Yes, I read the articles and watch the videos, but for some strange reason, that area is always "on the back burner" for now, as there are so many other topics vying for attention.

So, I do appreciate your posts, Soc, along with RR.  A little side note:  I saw Dr. Elaine Ingham give a presentation at a conference on genetic engineering back in the late 1990's and she is just as you said--quite knowledgeable on soil, soil microorganisms, etc.  She also told the audience about her invovlement with a genetically engineered bacterium, called at that time Klebsiella planticola, and how it had been mutated so that it could break down spent crop residue at end of season.  Problem is the genetic changes made this common soil bacterium a sort of plant killer.  It produced ethanol, or possibly some other alcohol, and in the process was really good at killing plants, any and all plants.  When they discovered this, they retrieved all of the cultures and burned them to make certain it never "got out", where it would have literally had a "field day" eating its way across the planet.

She said, "we think we got it all.

That reminds me of a troubling trend in "natural" farming methods: using Bt in soil and on plants.  It's not permitted under organic certification, but yet the health food store sells it as a "natural" garden resource.  Very concerning.  Sometimes another "natural" version of this is also done: lacing soil with GMO cornmeal, due to the Bt content of the corn used...
Title: Elaine Ingham podcasts on Spotify
Post by: Socrates on June 16, 2020, 08:15:42 AM
Since there are so many talks to choose from, i offer you here one that i feel gives a great all-round feel and content, this one on Spotify with host Probiotic Life (https://open.spotify.com/episode/4j1jUwEotMCOggKFZSALa9). A great primer.
A collegue at work studied biology at university. Also teaching now. I was sharing my excitement about Elaine Ingham and that she needs to look into it, especially since her next steps in schooling happen to involve the very subject matter Dr. Ingham covers. I gave her a great shortcut, the 3 podcasts i saved on my Spotify account.
To find these podcasts, get on Spotify, search "Elaine Ingham" and you'll see the playlist i made. (Obviously) it's the only playlist by that name.

There are SO many interviews and podcasts concerning Elaine Ingham and her work and after listening to maybe 20 of them, I found that 3 of them were especially to-the-point and bursting with information. I've listened to these many times.
If you're interested in how soil really works and how to get good soil going, it would be wise to listen to all three of these interviews. Each one really covers a different aspect of her work. Each has it's own vibe and is part of the whole which is Dr. Ingham's body of work going back 45 years.

Just to stress one more time since i just listened to these interviews again and was again struck by how counterintuitive it all actually is, Dr. Ingham explains in detail how production can easily, quickly and cheaply be increased up to 10-fold. In the end, if you know what you're doing, you'll...
- have fields that don't need to be watered
- have soil that deters all pests and disease because aerobic life won't let them propagate
- have large, healthy plants that produce huge quantities of best quality fruits
- not have to add anything to your fields other than (proper) compost one single time

Maybe it sounds too good to be true and i have to admit that i have apparently been focused on a few trivial matters as well, such as adding diluted seawater as a way of adding minerals to land; the distinction Dr. Ingham explains is that it's always about soluble minerals that plants can absorb, but just about all fields have vast amounts of inorganic minerals waiting to be turned into soluble minerals by the lifeforms in good soil. Minerals, therefore, are not at issue; subterranean life is.
For this reason as well Dr. Ingham explains that the insane productivity she is accomplishing, such as fields of maize with 10 ears of corn per plant, is not only possible but that, year after year. As long as one does not make one's field barren or compacted or kill subterranean life by adding (many) inorganic supplements [like salts], the productivity should remain.
In one of these interviews she refers to herself as the world's laziest gardener. Only, her way not only means a fraction of the effort conventional farmers put in, but an end to annual preparations, as superior harvests ensue, in quality as well as quantity.