Being In It for the Species The Kolbrin Bible Complete Danjeon Breathing System Home Study System

Author Topic: California earthquakes  (Read 19718 times)

BuddhaKitty

  • Prolific Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 223
  • Karma: +6/-0
Re: California earthquakes
« Reply #210 on: February 20, 2012, 12:13:25 PM »
jkb, do you mean the boxes that showed up in oregon, too?  does anyone know what they are?

JKB

  • Members
  • Prolific Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1538
  • Karma: +22/-2
  • There is no spoon.
Re: California earthquakes
« Reply #211 on: February 20, 2012, 12:51:11 PM »
Kitty, yes, those black boxes.  There has been several articles posted in here regarding the black boxes under the topic:  UFO's...  Star Ships...  They're here!
 
The Zeta's also commented on the black boxes last Friday:
 <blockquote> I listened to the trance ET channeler Alma Guthrie tonight, 02-13-2012, at midnight EST on Robert Pepino's The Whole Agenda show on the Micro Effect network and she said the boxes are ET devices put from Alaska to Mexico to even out the pressure of earth changes, discharge plate energy else the volcanoes and terrain would be devastating and devastated. She said some have been taken by the US and are being secretly studied. It is a gift from benevolent ETs to alleviate the coming earth changes caused by Planet X and also disturbances of the Sun, and of the Moon with the core of Earth. It does not have anything to do with any 'galactic alignment', as the dates of that are way off. I had never heard her before, and I adjudge it to be high quality information. She said these boxes are placed on the fault lines to vibrate to release pressure of the tectonic plates gradually; to not allow them to build up. The implication is that the government has some of them but they 'disappear' before they can be examined. The Zetas have said there are no ET devices on Earth at present, but these boxes have appeared since they said that. If they have been used before and disappeared when their tasks are done, then they are not a permanent addition. It makes sense that the vibrations would loosen the crust to move slowly rather than cataclysmically. [and from another] Humming Boxes on Oregon Beaches http://orangeorb.blogspot.com/2012/02/humming-boxes-on-oregon-beaches.html Ominous Metal Boxes Appearing After West Coast UFO Sightings http://beforeitsnews.com/story/1732/498/ Images from: http://www.weirdwiltshire.co.uk/archives/3230[and from another] UFO Sightings Reveal More Strange Metal Boxes Along Coastal Beaches [Feb 11]http://www.huliq.com/10282/ufo-sightings-reveal-more-strange-metal-boxes-along-coastal-beaches They can't be moved; even when yanked by a four-wheel drive truck pulling on heavy chains tied around these humming metal boxes that are still appearing as of Feb. 8 up and down West Coast beaches. As of late afternoon Feb. 8, Bill Hanshumaker, a public marine specialist and (Ph.D) doctor of marine science at the Hatfield Marine Science Center in nearby Newport, told Huliq in an interview that, "I don't know what they are." In turn, Doctor Hanshumaker said he's advised "surf monitoring" about these strange metal boxes that suddenly appeared along local beaches Feb. 6, and now seem to be multiplying like Star Trek "Tribbles." The photograph that accompanies this report - taken during the afternoon of Feb. 8 near Bray's Point - of yet another strange metal box stuck in the surf up is one of a possible group of a dozen or more that have been sited up and down West Coast beaches. Meanwhile, the British government also photographed similar huge metal boxes on beaches in Sri Lanka in the late 1990's and in early 2004 and 2005. The discovery of the boxes is detailed in updated previously classified reports from the British government that document sightings of unidentified flying objects by both the military and the general public dating back to the 1950s. UFO history filled with "mystery boxes" Locals all along Sri Lanka's beaches stating "the strange metal boxes appeared suddenly, and after numerous reported UFO sightings." Of course, both local police here along the coast and back in the day when the Sri Lanka boxes were discovered, state that "they are probably from a container ship," that theory doesn't hold water since both the central Oregon coast and the coast of Sri Lanka are not accessible to container ships.

</blockquote>
These sealed metal boxes are indeed alien, placed along significant coastlines to abort sudden and jolting plate movements. The number of boxes discovered by mankind, uncloaked and visible, are a miniscule number compared to the total in use, which range in the thousands. Most are under water. They are supposed to be cloaked, so that humans can look right at them and not SEE them, but mistakes are made in the rush to place the boxes, on occasion, so some are left visible. Have governments removed them and tried to crack them open? Yes, but the boxes disappear from storage, without a trace.

Why is the impact of plate movements being restrained, at present, when the Council of Worlds has ruled that the Pole Shift is a natural event not to be averted? It has scarcely passed notice that our original statements about the 7 of 10 scenarios, whereby we anticipated a rapid start at the end of 2010, did not unfold. The 7 of 10 pace has been slow, not rapid. The Council of Worlds wants the public to be aware of what is happening, what is pending, so that spiritual decisions can be made, the population having opportunity to evaluate the situation properly. The cover-up has prevented that school house lesson from occurring.

Thus, temporarily, the pace of change here on Earth will be slowed, but not averted. Nor is the ultimate result or timeframe being changed. The battleground is on the cover-up, as the recent decision to allow more visibility of the Planet X complex has shown. For those who wonder how the boxes work, why the hum or aurora type glow they occasionally emit, we have no comment. You would not understand the mechanics, nor be able to replicate the boxes, and in any case if the secrets were understood those in the Service-to-Self in your establishment would use this information to control and harm the common man. The boxes will remain a mystery, in this regard.
 
I hope they are staving off mass destruction as this area is ripe for it condisering all of the quakes and natural disasters going on around the rest of the world.  Peace.  JKB
 
« Last Edit: February 20, 2012, 12:54:00 PM by JKB »
You have to let it all go Neo.  Fear, doubt, and disbelief...  Free your mind.

Yowbarb

  • Administrator
  • Prolific Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32123
  • Karma: +26/-0
  • Reaching For Survival
California earthquakes EARTHQUAKE WATCH 21 March 2012
« Reply #212 on: March 21, 2012, 12:35:09 AM »
http://murrieta.patch.com/articles/earthquake-76m-strikes-acapulco-oaxaca-region-on-convergent-margin   

CURRENT WORDING

EARTHQUAKE WATCH
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WEATHER AUTHORITY
A Division of TheWeatherSpace.com
ISSUED MAR 20, 2012 - 12:10p

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ...

THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WEATHER AUTHORITY HAS ISSUED A EARTHQUAKE WATCH EFFECTIVE NOW THROUGH THE NEXT 48 HOURS ...


UPDATE: Following a magnitude 7.6 earthquake Tuesday near Mexico City, an earthquake watch for the next 48 hours was issued by The Southern California Weather Authority, a division of The WeatherSpace.com:

"There are many times when a quake this close, or along our plate boundary, produces a concern for elevated earthquake activity across the Pacific Coast, California included.

"Many occasions have noted this type of pattern, especially from Central America to California so this watch will be in place for the next 48 hours as this is the crucial time for the faults to be disturbed by the strong quake south of here.

"Predicting earthquakes is not possible, but there may be warning signs within a pattern that help produce the type of alert such as a watch so you can make sure you have your earthquake priorities checked and stay alert during the watch period.

"An earthquake watch does not mean an earthquake is forecast, but does mean there is a concern for an elevated risk on our fault-zones."

ORIGINAL POST:

A magnitude 7.6 earthquake was recorded Tuesday before noon Pacific Time in the Acapulco-Oaxaca region of Mexico, south of Baja, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.

"The preliminary report is a 7.6 magnitude event," said Ryan Gold, a research geologist with the National Earthquake Information Center in Golden, Colorado. "The way these things work magnitude will likely be revised as more stations report."

The quake was measured at 10.9 miles below the Earth's surface at 12:02 p.m. local time in Acapulco. That would be 11:02 a.m. Pacific Time in Murrieta.

"It looks like it's a reverse faulting, thrust-fault event, and that could be refined as more information comes in," Gold said. "This area is a convergent margin where one plate is subducting under Mexico."

Gold said he and other scientists were alerted before noon Pacific Time.

"We were just alerted 15 to 20 minutes ago," Gold told Banning-Beaumont Patch in a phone interview.

Murrieta is located about 40 miles southwest of the San Gorgonio Pass, which is astride the San Andreas Fault, where the North American Plate and Pacific Plate meet.
 Related Topics: 7.6 Magnitude, Acapulco Earthquake, Earthquake Watch, Mexico City Earthquake, North American Plate, Pacific Plate, and San Andreas Fault

Yowbarb

  • Administrator
  • Prolific Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32123
  • Karma: +26/-0
  • Reaching For Survival
Re: California earthquakes
« Reply #213 on: March 21, 2012, 05:34:06 AM »
The Earthquake Watch for Southern CA will be expired as of 12:10 PM today.
No big quakes there in CA or anywhere in the US.
I don't see a small quake swarm in the southern CA area either so possibly
this will be an OK day. A few hours to go yet...
Yowbarb

================================================
http://www.southerncaliforniaweatherauthority.com/watches/eqw1.html

EARTHQUAKE WATCH
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WEATHER AUTHORITY
A Division of TheWeatherSpace.com
ISSUED MAR 20, 2012 - 12:10p

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ...

THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WEATHER AUTHORITY HAS ISSUED A EARTHQUAKE WATCH EFFECTIVE NOW THROUGH THE NEXT 48 HOURS ...

Yowbarb

  • Administrator
  • Prolific Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32123
  • Karma: +26/-0
  • Reaching For Survival
Re: California earthquakes
« Reply #214 on: March 21, 2012, 05:45:51 AM »
Lots of small quakes northern CA yesterday.
Some small southern CA quakes yesterday. Today is quiet so far...
Yowbarb

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsus/Maps/US10/32.42.-125.-115_eqs.php

Yowbarb

  • Administrator
  • Prolific Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32123
  • Karma: +26/-0
  • Reaching For Survival
Re: California earthquakes
« Reply #215 on: December 21, 2012, 05:55:20 PM »
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqscanv/FaultMaps/Los_Angeles.html

Earthquake list for map of Los Angeles

Update time = Sat, 22 Dec 2012 01:00:39 UTC
16 earthquakes in list

Mag   Date
y/m/d   Local Time
h:m:s   Latitude
deg   Longitude
deg   Depth
km   Location
2.0   2012/12/21   16:19:06   33.965N   118.288W   0.1   3 km ( 2 mi) NNE of Westmont, CA

1.2   2012/12/21   07:07:58   34.650N   118.394W   10.4   1 km ( 1 mi) SSW of Elizabeth Lake, CA

1.9   2012/12/20   12:35:21   33.859N   117.504W   0.0   6 km ( 4 mi) ESE of Corona, CA

2.0   2012/12/20   08:05:30   33.977N   117.174W   17.0   8 km ( 5 mi) NE of Moreno Valley, CA

1.2   2012/12/20   01:07:33   34.206N   117.399W   13.3   2 km ( 1 mi) S of Devore, CA

1.7   2012/12/19   12:22:15   34.529N   118.150W   10.0   7 km ( 4 mi) S of Desert View Highlands, CA

1.5   2012/12/19   07:16:42   34.285N   118.467W   10.2   3 km ( 2 mi) W of San Fernando, CA

1.8   2012/12/19   01:07:37   33.961N   118.417W   13.4   4 km ( 2 mi) ESE of Marina del Rey, CA

2.1   2012/12/18   23:43:15   33.950N   117.498W   10.2   4 km ( 3 mi) SSE of Mira Loma, CA

1.2   2012/12/18   02:24:34   34.019N   117.221W   17.6   4 km ( 3 mi) SE of Loma Linda, CA

1.6   2012/12/17   09:21:00   34.055N   117.298W   18.5   2 km ( 2 mi) ESE of Colton, CA

1.5   2012/12/16   20:34:56   34.024N   117.268W   16.9   3 km ( 2 mi) SSW of Loma Linda, CA

2.0   2012/12/15   21:52:06   34.251N   118.047W   13.5   3 km ( 2 mi) NNE of Mt. Wilson Observatory, CA

1.2   2012/12/15   18:40:49   34.121N   117.438W   7.9   3 km ( 2 mi) NE of Fontana, CA

1.2   2012/12/15   01:02:24   34.132N   117.473W   7.9   4 km ( 2 mi) NNW of Fontana, CA

1.4   2012/12/14   19:01:53   33.964N   118.407W   10.9   5 km ( 3 mi) ESE of Marina del Rey, CA

The most recent earthquakes are at the top of this list.
Back to map of Los Angeles

Yowbarb

  • Administrator
  • Prolific Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32123
  • Karma: +26/-0
  • Reaching For Survival
Re: California earthquakes
« Reply #216 on: July 23, 2013, 05:52:40 AM »
Small offshore California quake...  1mi 974.03yd off the coast... Nearly two miles
...................................................................................................

2.5 6km W of El Segundo, California 2013-07-23 08:40:01 UTC-04:0013.2 km
4.4
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/map/

JKB

  • Members
  • Prolific Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1538
  • Karma: +22/-2
  • There is no spoon.
Re: California earthquakes
« Reply #217 on: August 15, 2013, 03:45:29 PM »
I didn't feel a single earthquake in San Diego from Dec 2011 until we left in July of this year.  That is a good thing but I have always rather enjoyed them.
You have to let it all go Neo.  Fear, doubt, and disbelief...  Free your mind.

Yowbarb

  • Administrator
  • Prolific Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32123
  • Karma: +26/-0
  • Reaching For Survival
Re: California earthquakes
« Reply #218 on: August 17, 2013, 07:33:48 PM »
I didn't feel a single earthquake in San Diego from Dec 2011 until we left in July of this year.  That is a good thing but I have always rather enjoyed them.

JKB - well that's good! There are dozens...hundreds of small quakes...
I'm not particularly afraid of them but I have been going through them since the 1947 and 1948 ones in  southern CA...
Been through a lot of them...Northridge quake our apt building went off of its foundation and back on everything fell straight out of the cupboards...whotta mess. Refrigerator slid across the kitchen. The hot water heater disconnected and moved.. table slid... Luckily the side of the building did not fall out like so many others in the area... Hollywood CA Jan 1993.
Anyway I'm not afraid...just no longer want to live in quake zones and try to do some prepping so it won't be so bad...hopefully...

Endtimesgal_2012

  • Guest
Re: California earthquakes
« Reply #219 on: August 17, 2013, 08:07:49 PM »
When I was in grade school we lived in Fresno CA.  We had a really bad earthquake one night, thankfully none of us were hurt, but it caused a huge crevasse in the street at least 5 feet deep or more.  Very scary.

Yowbarb

  • Administrator
  • Prolific Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32123
  • Karma: +26/-0
  • Reaching For Survival
Re: California earthquakes
« Reply #220 on: August 20, 2013, 06:29:46 PM »
When I was in grade school we lived in Fresno CA.  We had a really bad earthquake one night, thankfully none of us were hurt, but it caused a huge crevasse in the street at least 5 feet deep or more.  Very scary.

That does sound scary...!

Yowbarb

  • Administrator
  • Prolific Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32123
  • Karma: +26/-0
  • Reaching For Survival
Re: California earthquakes
« Reply #221 on: November 05, 2013, 01:40:19 AM »

Yowbarb

  • Administrator
  • Prolific Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32123
  • Karma: +26/-0
  • Reaching For Survival
Re: California earthquakes
« Reply #222 on: November 11, 2013, 08:08:59 AM »
Yowbarb Note:
I haven't been posting many southern California quakes, lately.
Global Moderator Jim Farmer does a good job of posting the general outline of quakes.


>> [ Topic: http://planetxtownhall.com/index.php?topic=5247.315;topicseen#lastPost ] <<

I feel it is a possibility we will be seeing some bigger quakes in so Cal soon.
Oh yes, here is another link for a list of all current Ca and NV quakes:
  http://www.data.scec.org/recent/recenteqs/Quakes/quakes0.html

Yowbarb

  • Administrator
  • Prolific Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32123
  • Karma: +26/-0
  • Reaching For Survival
Re: California earthquakes
« Reply #223 on: January 28, 2018, 09:04:15 AM »
Yowbarb Note: It's a bit of an exaggeration to say CA has been "rocked" by a M3.4 
but this article does show an increase in seismic activity. Video on page

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/910789/California-earthquake-today-map-san-andreas-fault-line-latest-news-big-one

California earthquake LIVE: Latest update along San Andreas fault as series of shocks hit
CALIFORNIA has been rocked by a fresh earthquake measuring 3.4 in magnitude while Alaska continues to be hit by mid-sized earthquakes after a 7.9 magitude earthquake struck off the coast of Alaska this week. Here are the latest news and updates.
By KAT HOPPS
PUBLISHED: 15:30, Sun, Jan 28, 2018 | UPDATED: 15:34, Sun, Jan 28, 2018

New earthquakes have hit California and Alaska after seismic activity remains unpredictable along the San Andreas fault line.
The latest mid-sized earthquake to hit Alaska was a 5.1 magnitude shock south-east of Nikolski at 12.11am.
An earthquake measuring 3.4 magnitude struck El Ceritto, California at 12.47pm yesterday (4.47am local time).
A massive 7.9 magnitude earthquake hit 233km off Alaska on Tuesday, triggering a tsunami warning for Alaska and the US west coast. [ Read more https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/910789/California-earthquake-today-map-san-andreas-fault-line-latest-news-big-one ]

 

Surviving the Planet X Tribulation: A Faith-Based Leadership Guide

Surviving the Planet X Tribulation: A Faith-Based Leadership Guide

This uplifting and entertaining guide is written to give you, the reader, confidence and hope through effective leadership techniques and survival community strategies designed for an extended tribulation. Learn more...

Advertise

Marshall's Motto

Destiny comes to those who listen, and fate finds the rest.

So learn what you can learn, do what you can do, and never give up hope!